Sunday, February 01, 2009

Eminent Domain amendment moving through state assembly

Charlottesville, Va.- A state Constitutional amendment is moving through the General Assembly. Delegate Rob Bell of the 58th District (northern Albemarle and Greene counties) is the sponsor. Bell also sponsored the 2007 eminent domain reform statute. Because statutes can be changed in any session with a simple majority vote of Delegates and state Senators, there's been a movement to write the reforms into the Virginia Constitution. The House of Delegates has 100 members and the Senate has 40 members.

According to Richmond Sunlight, HJ725 is awaiting a vote in the Privileges and Elections Committee as of Jan. 22, 2009. See also: "2007: Virginia Reforms Eminent Domain", Jan. 12, 2008.


HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 725
Offered January 14, 2009
Prefiled January 14, 2009
Proposing an amendment to Section 11 of Article I of the Constitution of Virginia, relating to takings of private property.
----------
Patron-- Bell
----------
Committee Referral Pending
----------
RESOLVED by the House of Delegates, the Senate concurring, a majority of the members elected to each house agreeing, That the following amendment to the Constitution of Virginia be, and the same hereby is, proposed and referred to the General Assembly at its first regular session held after the next general election of members of the House of Delegates for its concurrence in conformity with the provisions of Section 1 of Article XII of the Constitution of Virginia, namely:

Amend Section 11 of Article I of the Constitution of Virginia as follows:

ARTICLE I
BILL OF RIGHTS
Section 11. Due process of law; obligation of contracts; taking of private property; prohibited discrimination; jury trial in civil cases.

That no person shall be deprived of his life, liberty, or property without due process of law; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts, [delete]nor any law whereby private property shall be taken or damaged for public uses, without just compensation, the term "public uses" to be defined by the General Assembly;[delete] and that the right to be free from any governmental discrimination upon the basis of religious conviction, race, color, sex, or national origin shall not be abridged, except that the mere separation of the sexes shall not be considered discrimination.

That in controversies respecting property, and in suits between man and man, trial by jury is preferable to any other, and ought to be held sacred. The General Assembly may limit the number of jurors for civil cases in courts of record to not less than five.

[Replace above deleted with]

That the General Assembly shall not pass any law whereby private property shall be taken or damaged without just compensation; nor shall it pass any law pursuant to which private property shall be taken other than for a public use. "Public use" embraces only the acquisition of property where:

(a) the property is taken for the possession, ownership, occupation, and enjoyment of property by the public or the Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof or any incorporated municipality therein or any public agency of the Commonwealth or of any political subdivision thereof or of any municipality therein;

(b) the property is taken for construction, maintenance, or operation of
(i) airports, landing fields, and air navigation facilities;
(ii) educational facilities;
(iii) flood control, bank and shore protection, watershed protection, and dams; (iv) hospital facilities;
(v) judicial and court facilities;
(vi) correctional facilities, including jails and penitentiaries;
(vii) library facilities;
(viii) military installations;
(ix) parks so designated by the Commonwealth or by the locality in its comprehensive plan;
(x) properties of historical significance so designated by the Commonwealth;
(xi) law-enforcement, fire, emergency medical, and rescue facilities;
(xii) sanitary sewer, water, or stormwater facilities;
(xiii) transportation facilities including highways, roads, streets, and bridges, traffic signals, related easements and rights-of-way, mass transit, ports, and any components of federal, state, or local transportation facilities;
(xiv) waste management facilities for hazardous, radioactive, or other waste; (xv) office facilities occupied by a public corporation; and
(xvi) such other facilities that are necessary to the construction, maintenance, or operation of a public facility as listed in clauses (i) through (xv) and directly related thereto by the Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof or any incorporated municipality therein or any public agency of the Commonwealth or of any political subdivision thereof or of any municipality therein, or by a private entity if there exists a written agreement between the private entity and the Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof or any incorporated municipality therein or any public agency of the Commonwealth or of any political subdivision thereof or of any municipality therein that provides for use of the facility by the public;

(c) the property is taken for the creation or functioning of any public service corporation, public service company, or railroad;

(d) the property is taken for the provision of any authorized utility service by a county or municipality, or entity or agency thereof, that provides or operates one or more of the following authorized utility services: gas, pipeline, electric light, heat, power, water supply, sewer, telephone, or telegraph;

(e) the property is taken for the elimination of blight, provided that the property itself is property that endangers the public health or safety in its condition at the time of the filing of the petition for condemnation and is
(i) a public nuisance or
(ii) an individual commercial, industrial, or residential structure or improvement that is beyond repair or unfit for human occupancy or use; or

(f) the property taken is in a redevelopment or conservation area and is abandoned or the acquisition is needed to clear title where one of the owners agrees to such acquisition or the acquisition is by agreement of all the owners.

No more private property may be taken than that which is necessary to achieve the stated public use. If the acquisition of only part of a property would leave its owner with an uneconomic remnant, the condemnor shall offer to acquire the entire property for its fair market value as otherwise provided by law, but the condemnor shall not acquire an uneconomic remnant if the owner objects and desires to maintain ownership of the excess property.

Except where property is taken for the creation or functioning of a public service corporation, public service company, or railroad, or for the provision of any authorized utility service by a government utility corporation, private property can only be taken if
(i) the public interest dominates the private gain and
(ii) the primary purpose is not private financial gain, private benefit, an increase in tax base or tax revenues, or an increase in employment.

Subject to the foregoing provisions, the limitations contained in this section shall not abrogate any other provision of law that authorizes a condemnor to dispose of property taken for a public use as surplus property, as otherwise provided by general law.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

New Urban Renewal Director, Same Old Lies


Randy Bickers (courtesy WVIR-TV NBC-29)


Charlottesville, Va.—On January 7, 2009, Redevelopment and Housing Authority employee and civil rights opponent Randy Bickers will be promoted to Executive Director, according to WVIR-TV NBC-29’s Henry Graff ( “New Housing Director in Charlottesville”, Dec. 22, 2008).

When did Bickers say he opposes civil rights? Never. His actions speak louder than his words. The Authority seizes and sells real estate in the name of eminent domain, which prohibits seizing property for private use and private ownership. In the WVIR story, Bickers credits the 1960 Vinegar Hill clearance as the main reason public housing residents distrust government.

Vinegar Hill must have been an incredibly traumatic event to be the sole cause of distrust almost 50 years later. Is it possible that larger, more recent projects might contribute to that distrust? Is it possible that Bickers’ dishonesty (lying by omission) might contribute to the public’s skepticism?

Not only is Bickers dishonest, he also opposes the preservation of black history. The history of the Housing Authority is intertwined with local black history (and white history). In 2007, in response to a request for proof the Authority owns the parking lot on Levy Avenue, Bickers gave the deed references for only 2 of the 10 parcels that comprise the lot.

In a follow-up request for proof of ownership for the remaining 80% of the property, Bickers referred Blair Hawkins to the city’s legal department. Barbara Ronan released the deed references for the other 8 parcels, which were seized in 1972. The Authority is still trying to sell the stolen property.

Below is a spreadsheet inventory of what the Housing Authority claims to be its 11 public housing sites and the vacant Levy Avenue property. The spreadsheet includes “Tax Map & Parcel ID” but omits any reference that could show actual ownership (Deed Book and Page numbers). The deed numbers are excluded because of the opposition to historic preservation. The deed numbers allow you to go straight to the city courthouse and trace the history of a property.

The agency claims it now owns 45 acres. Undisclosed is how much property the Authority has owned since its creation in 1954. The website omits the simple date of origin, further illustrating its antipathy to history.

Also below are aerial photos of 7 of the Authority’s 11 public housing sites. I’ve included them here in the likely event the Authority edits its website in the future to revise or erase more of our history.

Background Links

“Mayor repeats Vinegar Hill myth, Water Board chairman re-appointed”, Dec. 16, 2008.



Noah Schwartz

“Another Urban Renewal Director Resigns”, Oct. 5, 2008.

“2007:Levy Ave one of Many Stories”, Jan. 28, 2008.

“Levy Avenue update: All 5 owners identified”, Nov. 17, 2007. Includes deed references to the actual owners.

“Land for Vinegar Hill condo tower once owned by John West and Madam Marguiretta”, Sep. 13, 2007. Example of how informative tracing a deed can be.

“Asst city manager Small-Toney resigns, blocked access to public records”, May 23, 2007. I still don’t have access to the archives. UVa historian Scot French, now Historical Society board member, was the last person who claimed to have put the archives online. But I haven’t been able to find them anywhere.

“Council refuses to release urban renewal archives: Jefferson School conflict of interest: Blighted House has until Feb 15”, Nov. 21, 2006.

On Feb. 24, 2007, at the First Baptist Church on West Main, also site of the first Jefferson School in 1865, Luanne Williams said the archives in their study comprised

1,189 visual media files
6,845 physical documents
189 maps and blueprints
6,199 files related to GIS mapping

for a total of 14,422.



The blog you are now reading contains more about Charlottesville’s urban renewal than any other online source. A Google search does not find these archives. How long does it take to falsify documents and delete any reference to urban renewal which is not Vinegar Hill?

Dr. Scot French and his book The Rebellious Slave: Nat Turner in American Memory.

Scot French’s personal homepage at the University of Virginia.

Virginia Center for Digital History at UVA was said to possess the archives in Feb. 2007. A search for “urban renewal” returns no entries.

In January 2009 I will contact these people again and ask them to explain what happened to this project and these archives. The last time I contacted Scot French was Nov. 2007. He’s had over a year to publish this project. Did he really think I would give up and go away, and not record his role in this history?


Inventory of 11 Public Housing sites and vacant Levy Ave property according to CRHA (Page 1 of 2)


Inventory of 11 Public Housing sites and vacant Levy Ave property according to CRHA (Page 2 of 2)


Map showing the 11 sites as of October 2006

Does not include sold properties such as Vinegar Hill, Omni Hotel, Friendship Court (150 units), Garrett Street, ACAC, Norcross Condos, Gleason Luxury Condos, Ridge Lane and many others.


Aerial map of Westhaven constructed March 1965, 126 units at 801-836 Hardy Drive [Corrected for copying down wrong date] (Construction dates according to CRHA)


Crescent Halls constructed September 1976, 105 units at 500 South 1st Street


South 1st Street constructed September 1981, 58 units at 900-1000 S. 1st St.


Riverside constructed September 1980, 16 units at 309-323 Riverside Avenue


Michie Drive constructed September 1980, 23 units at 2021-2025 Michie Drive


Madison Ave constructed September 1980, 18 units at 1609-1625 Mdison Avenue


905 Monticello Ave constructed June 1992 (one unit)


Not pictured here:

Sixth St. constructed March 1981, 25 units at 707-713 Sixth St. SE (Old Scottsville Road)
Hinton Ave, one unit constructed June 1992
Elsom St., one unit constructed June 1992
Ridge St., 2 units constructed September 1995

Current 7-Member Board of Commissioners who oversee the Housing Authority The meetings are held the fourth Monday of the month in City Hall Council Chambers at 7 p.m. and are now televised and available as a podcast.

1. Mr. Jason Halbert - Chair/Commissioner
Term Expires: 6/30/11

2. Mr. Hosea Mitchell - Vice Chair/Commissioner
Term Expires: 6/30/11

3. Ms. Sherri Clarke - Resident Commissioner
Term Expires: 6/30/11

4. Mr. Richard H. Jones - Commissioner
Term Expires: 6/30/10

5. Ms. Joy Johnson– Resident Commissioner
Term Expires: 6/30/10

6. Mr. Dave Norris - City Council/Commissioner
Term Expires: 6/30/10

7. Mr. Bob Stevens- Treasurer/Commissioner
Term Expires: 6/30/10


Housing Authority Staff Members

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
City Hall
Phone#: (434) 970-3253 Fax #: (434) 971-4797

  1. Noah Schwartz- Executive Director
  2. Amy Kilroy - Redevelopment Director
  3. Donna Evans- Accounting Manager
  4. LeAnn Hinton -Accountant
  5. Jewel Mason - Prevention Specialist
  6. Deetra West- Administrative Assistant


MAINTENANCE OFFICE
1000 South First Street
Phone #: (434) 971-4656 Fax #: (434) 293-3460

  1. Heather Jeffries- Asset Manager
  2. Jacquline Sedwick- Property Manager
  3. Patricia Lockley- Property Manager
  4. Darkita Brown - Administrative Assistant
  5. Larry Andes - Maintenance Tech II
  6. Lonnie Dwyer - Maintenance Tech II
  7. Cobi Copper- Maintenance Tech I
  8. Curtis Glover - Maintenance Tech I
  9. Travis Houchens - Maintenance Tech I (Part-Time)
  10. Scott Shifflett - Maintenance Tech I
  11. Jennifer Warren - Maintenance Tech I
  12. Brandon Bartee - Resident Apprentice Program
  13. Jamar Luck - Resident Apprentice Program


RENTAL OFFICE
500 South First Street
Phone #: (434) 296-1863 Fax #: (434) 971-4795

  1. Rebecca Weybright -Housing Manager
  2. Kelly Marquez - Public Housing Certification Specialist I- strotherm@charlottesville.org
  3. Maxicelia Strother- Public Housing Eligibility Specialist I - jacksonl@charlottesville.org
  4. Lynn Jackson- Housing Choice Voucher Certification Specialist I- marquez@charlottesville.org
  5. Cynthia Williams - Housing Choice Voucher Specialist
  6. Vanessa Johnson- Administrative Assistant
  7. Jesse Butler - Inspector/Special Programs Administrator

Labels: , , , , ,